Practitioner Feedback

Professional Context

Professional role

Sector

How did you encounter this resource? (tick all that apply)

CPD / professional development session Conference or workshop Colleague recommendation Professional research Self-directed exploration

Professional Value

To what extent do you agree with the following statements about the resource's value for your professional practice?

1 = Strongly disagree 5 = Strongly agree

This resource provides a useful model for presenting contested heritage to diverse audiences.

The resource offers frameworks I can apply to heritage interpretation challenges in my own context.

The discussion of "soft gatekeeping" helps me identify similar patterns in heritage governance.

The resource demonstrates responsible approaches to representing difficult histories in digital/immersive media.

This resource models transparency about evidence, interpretation, and disclosing omissions.

1 = Strongly disagree 5 = Strongly agree

Practice Change (Optional)

Reminder: Please do not include names or identifying details about colleagues or institutions.

What (if anything) will you do differently as a result of engaging with this resource?

Follow-up Contact (Optional)

Would you be willing to be contacted for a short follow-up about how you have used this resource in your professional practice? This helps us document impact for research assessment.

May we contact you for follow-up?

Yes No

Simulating Silence

About This Form

Professional Context

Professional Value

Practice Change (Optional)

Follow-up Contact (Optional)

🔄 Withdrawal Information