Institutional Positions
Publicly documented positions on Hashima's contested heritage
This page surveys the publicly documented positions of key institutions involved in Hashima's heritage governance. These positions — drawn from official statements, UNESCO documents, media interviews, and published reports — reveal the interpretive frameworks and political dynamics that shape how the island's history is presented.
Learning context: This material is integrated into Module 07: Positions & Perspectives, which examines how these institutional dynamics shaped the HashimaXR project.
Japanese Government Position
The 2015 UNESCO Statement
At the 39th session of the World Heritage Committee in Bonn, Japan's delegation stated: "Japan is prepared to take measures that allow an understanding that there were a large number of Koreans and others who were brought against their will and forced to work under harsh conditions in the 1940s at some of the sites, and that, during World War II, the Government of Japan also implemented its policy of requisition."
Japan committed to "incorporate appropriate facilities to remember the victims" and to implement "interpretive strategy to remember the victims."
Industrial Heritage Information Center (IHIC)
Japan established the Industrial Heritage Information Center in Shinjuku, Tokyo, as its interpretive response to the 2015 commitment. The center presents testimonies from former island residents, documents about industrial development, and displays about daily life on Hashima.
Critics and the UNESCO monitoring mission have noted that the IHIC does not include testimony from Korean or Chinese forced laborers, does not display evidence of coercive recruitment, and presents accounts that describe harmonious community life without reference to the labor regime of the 1940s.
UNESCO/ICOMOS Position
2021 Monitoring Mission Report
A joint UNESCO/ICOMOS Reactive Monitoring mission visited Japan in September 2021 to assess implementation of the 2015 commitments. The mission report concluded:
"The Mission Team could not identify any display panel, section, or element in IHIC that could be seen specifically to memorialize the victims of forced labor during WWII."
The mission found that interpretive materials "do not allow an understanding that there were a large number of Koreans and others who were brought against their will and forced to work under harsh conditions."
World Heritage Committee "Strong Regret"
The World Heritage Committee expressed "strong regret that the State Party has not yet fulfilled its commitment" and urged Japan to "give due effect to the interpretive measures it committed to implement."
This language — "strong regret" — is notably critical by UNESCO diplomatic standards, where inscribed sites are rarely subject to such direct censure.
South Korean Government Position
Objection to UNESCO Inscription
South Korea objected to Japan's Meiji Industrial Sites nomination on the grounds that several component sites, including Hashima, were locations of wartime forced labor of Korean nationals. Korea sought an explicit acknowledgment of this history as a condition of not blocking inscription.
Following Japan's 2015 statement, Korea has continued to monitor implementation of the interpretive commitments, with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs issuing periodic statements expressing concern that commitments remain unfulfilled. In July 2021, the Ministry issued a statement following the World Heritage Committee decision, noting that "the international community explicitly confirmed that Japan has not yet implemented the Committee's recommendations."
Ongoing UNESCO Engagement
South Korea was elected to the UNESCO World Heritage Committee in November 2023 for a four-year term through 2027. At the 47th session in July 2025, Korea proposed including Japan's implementation failure on the agenda, but Japan's amendment to exclude discussion passed by a vote of 7–3. Korea's representative stated: "The materials on display still failed to reflect the experiences of Koreans and others who were brought against their will and forced to work under harsh conditions in the 1940s. This is not a minor omission — it silences the lived realities that official narratives too often exclude."
Foundation for Victims of Forced Mobilization by Imperial Japan
South Korea has supported research and documentation of forced labor history through the Foundation for Victims of Forced Mobilization by Imperial Japan (일제강제동원피해자지원재단), established under the Ministry of the Interior and Safety. The Foundation implements memorial projects, supports the discovery and repatriation of victims' remains, and conducts research relating to forced mobilization. It was designated in 2023 as the entity to administer compensation payments following Supreme Court rulings ordering Japanese companies to pay reparations to forced labor victims.
Scholarly Perspectives
Critical analyses of Hashima's heritage governance — including heritage studies frameworks, peer-reviewed research, and theoretical perspectives — are documented on a separate page.
What These Positions Reveal
The documented institutional positions reveal several patterns in heritage governance:
- The gap between commitment and implementation. Japan's 2015 UNESCO statement established clear obligations; the IHIC's interpretive approach has not fulfilled them in UNESCO's assessment, as confirmed by the 2021 monitoring mission and subsequent committee decisions.
- Diplomatic language as constraint. UNESCO's ability to compel action is limited; "strong regret" represents the outer boundary of available criticism, and the July 2025 vote demonstrated how procedural mechanisms can shield states from accountability.
- The persistence of the controversy. A decade after inscription, the interpretive dispute remains unresolved and continues to shape heritage governance at the highest international levels.
- The interpretive trap. Projects face structural opposition regardless of their positioning, creating pressure toward silence — a dynamic that the HashimaXR project encountered directly.
- Asymmetries of power. Japan's position as UNESCO's third-largest financial contributor (approximately $91.7 million for 2024–2025) compared to South Korea's 14th-place ranking ($31.9 million) reflects broader structural inequalities in heritage governance.